RatingAPI Revisited

After reading up on the CommentAPI, if I were to write the RatingAPI, I'd pretty much plagiarize the CommentAPI but only make the following changes:

Remove the title and link elements (they are unnecessary).

Change the html discovery to:

<link rel="service.rating" type="text/xml" href="url goes here" title="Rating Interface" min="0" max="5"/>

Change the new comment element to a rating element:

<wfw:rating xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/RatingAPI/">
    <wfw:endpoint>http://bitworking.org/news/ratings/52</wfw:endpoint>
    <wfw:min>1</wfw:min>
    <wfw:max>5</wfw:max>
</wfw:rating>

What do you think?

What others have said

# re: Blog Implementations, commenting, and why everything isn't quite as good as it should be...
Requesting Gravatar... you've been HAACKED Aug 13, 2004 10:48 AM
# Moderating Comments. How About An API?
Requesting Gravatar... you've been HAACKED Aug 25, 2004 10:36 AM
# Moderating Comments. How About An API?
Requesting Gravatar... you've been HAACKED Jun 24, 2005 1:46 PM
# RSS Is Designed To Be Extended

What do you have to say?

(will show your gravatar)
Please add 2 and 4 and type the answer here: